Freakonomics

92 Voos
Freakonomics

Freakonomics

@Freakonomics

Shows that explore the hidden side of everything with Stephen Dubner. Check out our new show Better in Person on the Freakonomics YouTube channel.

www.youtube.com/@FreakonomicsIngressou em maio de 2026
In the spirit of our recent series on the economics of whaling, a listener has suggested we do a series on the economic history of beer. Thumbs up or down? If up, what would you be most excited to learn, and who would you want to hear from? All story ideas welcome. Thanks!
Hey Freak Radio listeners: how interested would you be in hearing a series about the economics of the airline industry? What specifically would you like to learn? Thanks!
What would you most like to know about blockchain, cryptocurrencies, and NFTs? (Also, would you like to learn all this in one episode, two, or even three?)
I happen to know three people who recently left their main careers (all of them long and successful careers) to teach high school math. Is this a story worth exploring on Freakonomics Radio or is it just a small, bland coincidence?
Robert Cialdini, pioneer in the science of persuasion, just published an expanded edition of his classic 1984 book “Influence”. This week, he gives a master class in the 7 psychological levers that lead us to buy, behave, or believe without a 2nd thought. freak.ws/3oYH3il
“Do we think that what's been happening has been working? If you think it's been working great, I might not be the candidate that you want. But if you think that we could genuinely use a change, I think I'm a great bet.” — @AndrewYang on this week’s ep: freak.ws/3eIbiqj
The book "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion," by Robert Cialdini, is one of the most — well, influential, books of the modern era. A revised edition is about to be released. Whether you've read it or not, what's the one question you'd like to hear Cialdini answer?
For 10+ years, we’ve been exploring the hidden side of everything, from the economics of sleep to the costs of noise, and everything in between. And starting tonight, every one of our nearly-450 episodes will be available on all podcast apps. Happy New Year!
Starting tomorrow night, our archive of nearly 450 episodes will be available for free on all podcast apps. 10+ years of upending conventional wisdom on just about everything — sports, politics, science, art, medicine and more.
For 10+ years we’ve been exploring the hidden side of everything, from the economics of sleep to the costs of noise, and everything in between. And starting Sunday, Jan. 17th, every one of our nearly-450 episodes will be available on all podcast apps. Happy New Year!
Happy 2021! In 2020, Freakonomics Radio had 100 million downloads. If you listened to one (or more), thank you! This will be an even bigger year for the Freakonomics Radio Network.
We are thinking about a new podcast devoted to just books + author interviews: what think? Also: book suggestions? Also: suggestions for the name of this podcast?
COVID-19 is spurring so much behavior change (in hygiene, work habits, public gathering, etc.) that it will likely launch a million academic studies that use the outbreak as a natural experiment. Any predictions about what kind of results we'll see?
Well-educated people who consume a lot of information tend to hold disproportionately extreme views, apparently because they’re really good at seeking out information that confirms their position and ignoring information that might run counter. bit.ly/2KWO5l2
Professor @JoBoaler says math curriculum needs an update. She says math teachers used to joke that “you’re never going to be walking around with a calculator in your hand.” And now? “Turns out everybody’s walking around with a calculator in their hand.” bit.ly/2nNthEh
Most high-school math classes are still preparing students for the Sputnik era. Steve Levitt wants to get rid of the “geometry sandwich” and instead have kids learn what they really need in the modern era: data fluency. bit.ly/2nNthEh
Well-educated people who consume a lot of information tend to hold disproportionately extreme views, apparently because they’re really good at seeking out information that confirms their position and ignoring information that might run counter. bit.ly/2XcmlwT
Students underestimated — by 64% — how long it would take to write their theses, according to a study. They're not alone. Stockbrokers, electrical engineers, doctors, holiday shoppers... we all fall prey to the “planning fallacy.” bit.ly/2VBVad9
Engineer James @Dyson made 5,127 prototypes of his vacuum before it was ready for market. That meant 5,126 failures. “It's almost slightly disappointing when it does work, because then you've got to get on to something else.” bit.ly/2H4LzJa
A listener just wrote to tell us that he's started a podcast club, just like a book club, but instead of coming together once a month to talk about a book they've all read, they discuss a specific podcast episode. Nice idea! Have you all heard of this practice?